MCP server risk

Tool name spoofing in MCP servers

ATR evaluates whether a tool name collides with or imitates another tool.

Why it matters

Components can change after approval. Tool definitions and packages may be updated, fetched dynamically, or replaced by lookalike publishers. A previous review may no longer describe the component in use.

In the registry

ATR evaluated this on 23 MCP servers in the 20 published reports, as of Nov. 9th, 2026, and found an issue in 1, across 1 report.

Each report shows the exact file and lines, why the issue matters, and the recommended fix, with a fix prompt you can paste into your coding agent. Browse the reports.

Questions

What does ATR check for tool name spoofing?

ATR evaluates whether a tool name collides with or imitates another tool. Each MCP server is assessed against 26 rules: 14 common, one guardrail, and 11 MCP-specific rules.

Why does tool name spoofing matter?

Components can change after approval. Tool definitions and packages may be updated, fetched dynamically, or replaced by lookalike publishers. A previous review may no longer describe the component in use.

How often does the registry find it?

ATR evaluated this on 23 MCP servers in the 20 published reports, as of Nov. 9th, 2026, and found an issue in 1, across 1 report.

How do I check my own MCP server?

Request a scan at bluerock.io/scan. Your first scan is free. Each MCP server is assessed against 26 rules: 14 common, one guardrail, and 11 MCP-specific rules.

Request a scan · All risks ATR checks

Source: BlueRock, Component Level Security Analysis for MCP Servers, Agent Skills and Plugins (Oct. 22nd, 2026).